SurveyMonkey - Survey Results

Response Summary

Wow, you have a popular survey!

Your survey has received 101 responses! As a basic account holder, you can view the first 100 responses. With a professional account, you'll be able to see all of your responses. Click here to upgrade now!

Show this Page Only

Page: General Information

Download Create Chart1. Scientific Background
	answered question		99
	skipped question		1
		Response Percent	Response Count
Biology/Biochemistry		72.7%	72
Bioinformatics		45.5%	45
Chemistry		0.0%	0
Computer Science		17.2%	17
Linguistics		2.0%	2
[ShowReplies]Other (please specify)			3

Download Create Chart2. What is your role/title with biological databases?
	answered question		93
	skipped question		7
		Response Percent	Response Count
Curator		57.0%	53
Faculty/Group Leader		18.3%	17
Research scientist		25.8%	24
Postdoc		9.7%	9
Student		5.4%	5
Programmer		18.3%	17
Funding agency representative		0.0%	0
Journal representative		0.0%	0
Teacher		1.1%	1
[ShowReplies]Other (please specify)			11

Download Create Chart3. Gender
	answered question		100
	skipped question		0
		Response Percent	Response Count
Female		55.0%	55
Male		45.0%	45

Show this Page Only

Page: Conference Venue and Hotel

Download Create Chart1. Conference Venue
	answered question					93
	skipped question					7
	excellent	good	satisfactory	improvable	Rating Average	Response Count
Accessibility	58.1% (54)	36.6% (34)	5.4% (5)	0.0% (0)	1.47	93
Surrounding Area	47.8% (44)	45.7% (42)	6.5% (6)	0.0% (0)	1.59	92
Equipment	45.7% (42)	45.7% (42)	7.6% (7)	1.1% (1)	1.64	92
Service	54.3% (50)	43.5% (40)	2.2% (2)	0.0% (0)	1.48	92
[ShowReplies]Comment						17

Download Create Chart2. Accomodation (Seminaris Conference Hotel)
	answered question					69
	skipped question					31
	excellent	good	satisfactory	improvable	Rating Average	Response Count
Hospitality	60.3% (41)	39.7% (27)	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	1.40	68
Breakfast	61.2% (41)	29.9% (20)	7.5% (5)	1.5% (1)	1.49	67
Reception Service	54.4% (37)	38.2% (26)	7.4% (5)	0.0% (0)	1.53	68
Room Service	43.4% (23)	47.2% (25)	9.4% (5)	0.0% (0)	1.66	53
[ShowReplies]Comment						22

Download Create Chart3. Food and Beverages
	answered question					92
	skipped question					8
	excellent	good	satisfactory	improvable	Rating Average	Response Count
Coffee Breaks	45.1% (41)	40.7% (37)	12.1% (11)	2.2% (2)	1.71	91
Lunch	33.7% (31)	52.2% (48)	7.6% (7)	6.5% (6)	1.87	92
Dinner	34.1% (31)	48.4% (44)	11.0% (10)	6.6% (6)	1.90	91
Reception	32.2% (29)	44.4% (40)	13.3% (12)	10.0% (9)	2.01	90
Poster Sessions	51.6% (47)	31.9% (29)	15.4% (14)	1.1% (1)	1.66	91
[ShowReplies]Comment						27

Show this Page Only

Page: Conference Program

Download Create Chart1. Which plenary talks did you attend?
	answered question		77
	skipped question		23
		Response Percent	Response Count
Janet Thornton		100.0%	77
Philip Bourne		93.5%	72
Jim Ostell		93.5%	72

Download Create Chart2. Did you find the topics of the plenary/invited talks useful for the community?
	answered question			76
	skipped question			24
	yes	no	partially	Response Count
Janet Thornton	91.9% (68)	1.4% (1)	6.8% (5)	74
Phil Bourne	92.9% (65)	1.4% (1)	5.7% (4)	70
Jim Ostell	92.9% (65)	0.0% (0)	7.1% (5)	70
Amos Bairoch	90.0% (63)	0.0% (0)	10.0% (7)	70
Dawn Field	66.2% (43)	6.2% (4)	27.7% (18)	65
Michael Cusick	72.1% (49)	4.4% (3)	23.5% (16)	68
Chris Evelo	76.9% (50)	4.6% (3)	18.5% (12)	65
Chris Thorpe	61.9% (39)	7.9% (5)	30.2% (19)	63
[ShowReplies]Comment				9

Download Create Chart3. Please indicate the quality/usefulness of the following sessions and workshops/tutorials:
	answered question						78
	skipped question						22
	1 most useful	2	3	4	5 least useful	Did not attend	Response Count
Literature Collection and Curation	37.3% (28)	33.3% (25)	12.0% (9)	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	17.3% (13)	75
Genome Sequence Annotation and Comparative Genomics	19.2% (14)	30.1% (22)	17.8% (13)	6.8% (5)	8.2% (6)	17.8% (13)	73
Standards, Controlled Vocabularies and Ontologies	25.3% (19)	34.7% (26)	18.7% (14)	2.7% (2)	1.3% (1)	17.3% (13)	75
Functional Genomics Data Curation	17.6% (13)	35.1% (26)	20.3% (15)	4.1% (3)	1.4% (1)	21.6% (16)	74
Supporting and Encouraging Community Curation and Deposition	30.6% (22)	38.9% (28)	9.7% (7)	1.4% (1)	0.0% (0)	19.4% (14)	72
Text Mining for the BioCuration Workflow	25.7% (19)	12.2% (9)	9.5% (7)	4.1% (3)	0.0% (0)	48.6% (36)	74
Best practices in Genome Annotation: Inference from Evidence	12.0% (9)	21.3% (16)	9.3% (7)	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	57.3% (43)	75
Online Training of New Curators	1.4% (1)	4.1% (3)	4.1% (3)	1.4% (1)	1.4% (1)	87.7% (64)	73
Protein Ontology and Community Curation	4.0% (3)	10.7% (8)	9.3% (7)	1.3% (1)	1.3% (1)	73.3% (55)	75
Poster sessions	49.3% (36)	39.7% (29)	4.1% (3)	1.4% (1)	0.0% (0)	5.5% (4)	73

Download Create Chart4. Please indicate the level of your interest in the following sessions and workshops/tutorials:
	answered question						71
	skipped question						29
	1 most useful	2	3	4	5 least useful	Did not attend	Response Count
Literature Collection and Curation	55.2% (37)	26.9% (18)	6.0% (4)	3.0% (2)	0.0% (0)	9.0% (6)	67
Genome Sequence Annotation and Comparative Genomics	26.5% (18)	30.9% (21)	13.2% (9)	7.4% (5)	13.2% (9)	8.8% (6)	68
Standards, Controlled Vocabularies and Ontologies	42.6% (29)	33.8% (23)	8.8% (6)	2.9% (2)	2.9% (2)	8.8% (6)	68
Functional Genomics Data Curation	32.8% (22)	31.3% (21)	16.4% (11)	7.5% (5)	3.0% (2)	9.0% (6)	67
Supporting and Encouraging Community Curation and Deposition	43.9% (29)	30.3% (20)	9.1% (6)	7.6% (5)	1.5% (1)	7.6% (5)	66
Text Mining for the BioCuration Workflow	36.9% (24)	23.1% (15)	9.2% (6)	9.2% (6)	1.5% (1)	20.0% (13)	65
Best practices in Genome Annotation: Inference from Evidence	19.7% (13)	18.2% (12)	12.1% (8)	4.5% (3)	3.0% (2)	42.4% (28)	66
Online Training of New Curators	7.8% (5)	14.1% (9)	10.9% (7)	3.1% (2)	4.7% (3)	59.4% (38)	64
Protein Ontology and Community Curation	12.1% (8)	19.7% (13)	7.6% (5)	6.1% (4)	1.5% (1)	53.0% (35)	66
Poster sessions	56.5% (39)	33.3% (23)	7.2% (5)	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	2.9% (2)	69

Download Create Chart5. General
	answered question					78
	skipped question					22
	excellent	good	satisfactory	improvable	Rating Average	Response Count
Quality of talks	35.9% (28)	60.3% (47)	2.6% (2)	1.3% (1)	1.69	78
Work of the session chairs	35.9% (28)	52.6% (41)	10.3% (8)	1.3% (1)	1.77	78
Time for discussions	12.8% (10)	41.0% (32)	32.1% (25)	14.1% (11)	2.47	78
Duration of the conference	39.7% (31)	48.7% (38)	10.3% (8)	1.3% (1)	1.73	78
Free afternoon on Saturday	40.5% (30)	37.8% (28)	9.5% (7)	12.2% (9)	1.93	74
[ShowReplies]Comment						23

Download Create Chart6. How did you hear about this conference?
	answered question	57
	skipped question	43
	yes	Response Count
E-mail notifcation	100.0% (44)	44
Website	100.0% (20)	20
Journal article	0.0% (0)	0
[ShowReplies]Other (please specify)		24

Show this Page Only

Page: Conference Organization

Download Create Chart1. Organization of the conference
	answered question					78
	skipped question					22
	excellent	good	satisfactory	improvable	Rating Average	Response Count
Communication with organizers	53.8% (42)	38.5% (30)	3.8% (3)	3.8% (3)	1.58	78
Conference website	39.7% (31)	41.0% (32)	16.7% (13)	2.6% (2)	1.82	78
Conference material	38.5% (30)	50.0% (39)	10.3% (8)	1.3% (1)	1.74	78
Sponsor information	21.4% (15)	54.3% (38)	20.0% (14)	4.3% (3)	2.07	70
[ShowReplies]Comment						12

Download Create Chart2. Did you think that the registration fee was appropriate?
	answered question		73
	skipped question		27
		Response Percent	Response Count
yes		78.1%	57
no		1.4%	1
partially		9.6%	7
too high		13.7%	10
too low		0.0%	0
[ShowReplies]Comment			7

Show this Page Only

Page: 4th International Biocuration Conference 2010, Japan

Download Create Chart1. Are you planning to attend the next Conference?
	answered question		77
	skipped question		23
		Response Percent	Response Count
yes		41.6%	32
no		5.2%	4
not sure yet		53.2%	41

Download2. Which topics should be added to the next conference?
	answered question	37
	skipped question	63
		Response Count
[ShowReplies]		37

Download3. Do you have suggestions for workshops or tutorials for the next conference?
	answered question	27
	skipped question	73
		Response Count
[ShowReplies]		27

Download4. Do you have general suggestions for the next conference?
	answered question	30
	skipped question	70
		Response Count
[ShowReplies]		30

Download5. What would be your most important 3 factors in deciding to attend the conference in Japan
	answered question	56
	skipped question	44
		Response Count
[ShowReplies]		56

Show this Page Only

Page: Comments, Suggestions

Download1. Please add any comments and suggestions here:
	answered question	23
	skipped question	77
		Response Count
[ShowReplies]		23